Los Ángeles Azules - Mis Sentimientos ft. Ximena Sariñana ..
Cyclist Charlie Alliston (if Alliston had front brakes on his bike, he would have been able to stop before the point of impact), Accused ( under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act ) Over Kim Briggs' Death (manslaughter of a pedestrian in England), 'Posted It Was Her Fault (“non-survivable brain injuries” )’ Court Told (the bike could not be legally ridden on the road because it did not have a front brake.). https://tinyurl.com/y8zszh4z
Bicycles are, in law, carriages (as Taylor v Goodwin judgment in 1879) and should be on the road, the owner should be full responsible for pedestrians safety, including "right of way", also control item with proper speed limit as any car, furthermore when approaching pedestrians, then by law control bicycle, speed and proper breaks to adjust the emergency.
Driving on pavements is prohibited, an offence under section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 (amended by Section 85 <1> of the Local Government Act 1888 and clause 72 remains in force today 2017), prohibited by rule 145 of the Highway Code and anyone that obstruct the highway is an offence under section 137 of the Highways Act 1980 (Section 329 <1>): "If any person shall willfully ride upon any footpath, or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers; or shall willfully lead or drive any carriage, horse, ass, sheep, mule, swine, or cattle or carriage of any description, or any truck or sledge, upon any such footpath or causeway; or shall tether any horse, ass, mule, swine, or cattle, on any highway, so as to suffer or permit the tethered animal to be thereon (UK laws after 1800's, as mention before)"-
Motor cars and bicycles were classed as carriages in the 1903 Motor Car Act. New legislation came into force (1/8/1999) to allow a fixed penalty notice to be served on anyone, who is guilty of cycling on a foot-way, rules change within the UK Union (Scotland, England, Wales, Ireland) and according to own laws.
A Footpath means a highway, where public have a right of way on foot only, walk routes (side of any road) away from roads (Road Traffic Act 1972), including towns and cities comes with foot-ways and footpaths (under the section 329 <1> Highways Act 1980). https://tinyurl.com/y7veqlyb
Highway Code rule 62 says: "Cycle Tracks. These are normally located away from the road, but may occasionally be found alongside footpaths or pavements. […] Take care when passing pedestrians, especially children, older or disabled people, and allow them plenty of room. Always be prepared to slow down and stop if necessary…Cyclists and pedestrians may be segregated or they may share the same space (unsegregated). When using segregated tracks you MUST keep to the side intended for cyclists as the pedestrian side remains a pavement or footpath"-
- Shops are prosecuted for having signs and other obstructions, but we must to understand the difference between a human person (Kim Briggs) and/or sign for shops.
- Alliston was riding an Olympics-style Planet X track bike which is illegal to ride on the street (https://tinyurl.com/ya39q3k8), pedaling at nearly 20 mph with no safety breaks and so the victim (RIP) was checking her mobile phone on the time of the accident, so who is responsible? -
When younger, a sister (mela) was driving her car with no breaks, at speed and told me just before facing the city of Mexico, mean we were about to crash and is today, when making this note, that maybe the car breaks, speed and everything was made with intention to hurt me, as sisters (mela and mara) were very close.
As sister (mela) and I were travelling by motorway from Puebla to Mexico city and car with no breaks and speed belongs before to another sister (mara), removed by my parents, after she (mara) defame my elder sister (josefa) husband of sexual issues, before him (javier corona) same sister (mara) blame my brother (jose) of same sexual issues and reasons why she (mara) was sent by my parents to live in Mexicali / Guadalajara (see photo) and as the years passed and improvement, purchased the car to (spoil) reward behavior, when I was forced to work after finished my basic education and sell American clothes to subside the low pay from my employment, but that sister (mara) was able to subside her life - no problem, based on lies and using my father business (ana maria) that paid everything, but removed my basic rights as member of that family and in order for sister (mara) blame and frame me after of all her matters, when never remembers why, she (mara) landed in that place in the first place, by her own making never mine, but after arrived back to puebla, everything that was mine terminate and passed to her for own gratification, never by hard work, together with brother (rafa) that assist each other and bonded in Mexicali / Guadalajara, always bring against my reputation a wave of criminal activity (maybe mela / mara car breaks, speed and everything was made with intention to hurt me, as sisters mela and mara were very close, compare to me, used as helper for her child!) and after married, with the aid from ex/husband sister, social worker and as explain in the link: http://rcp13.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/sinead-oconnor-mental-attitude-pope-and.html
Today sister (mara), brother (rafa) and ex/husband sister, social worker (carol parker) are charged by me (3), using my blog, "in public and for public concern" for the murder of my unborn children (3) "forced to terminate", by own actions against my reputation, with endless lies, defamation of character, slander, criminal activity, abuse, crime, intolerance, bullying, including brother (rafa) that went against me sexually, physically, verbally and members of my family heard my screams and in order to certify in law.
I protect me and my children with the law, any law worldwide, that my Lord is my witness, so help me God and so be it in Law, Rosario Castellanos de Parker.
Highway Act 1835
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Will4/5-6/50
POLITE REQUEST THIS NOTE IS FREE BUT PROTECTED WITH COPY RIGHTS. ESTA NOTA ES GRATUITA, PROHIBÍDO SU REPRODUCCIÓN Ó DISTRIBUICIÓN, RENTADA Ó IMPORTADA CON INTERESES EDUCATIVOS, POLITÍCOS Ó ECONOMICOS, USANDO PALABRAS SIMILARES Ó PARCIALES, BAJO LA PROTECCIÓN DE LA ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL, DE LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL (OMPI) SIN ANTES OBTENER PERMISO DE ROSARIO CASTELLANOS RUIZ.. Mayo2010. http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.html#reprod
No comments:
Post a Comment